Comments on: Fashion Editorial, SOMA, Feb ’09 http://graememitchell.com/blog/fashion-editorial-soma-feb-09 a photographer's footnotes, disjecta membra, et al. Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:04:13 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Laurel Canyon by Graeme Mitchell | Icon_ology http://graememitchell.com/blog/fashion-editorial-soma-feb-09/comment-page-1#comment-17246 Laurel Canyon by Graeme Mitchell | Icon_ology Thu, 07 Jan 2010 20:59:43 +0000 http://graememitchell.com/blog/?p=2947#comment-17246 [...] via Graeme's blogGrame MitchellSOMA [...]

[...] via Graeme's blogGrame MitchellSOMA [...]

]]> By: jw http://graememitchell.com/blog/fashion-editorial-soma-feb-09/comment-page-1#comment-7973 jw Tue, 03 Mar 2009 04:33:03 +0000 http://graememitchell.com/blog/?p=2947#comment-7973 picked up the mag today. Looks amazing, sucks about the error though. You slaughtered your lighting my friend. Can't believe how much you got done in such a short day. picked up the mag today. Looks amazing, sucks about the error though. You slaughtered your lighting my friend. Can’t believe how much you got done in such a short day.

]]> By: admin http://graememitchell.com/blog/fashion-editorial-soma-feb-09/comment-page-1#comment-7795 admin Sat, 14 Feb 2009 23:10:50 +0000 http://graememitchell.com/blog/?p=2947#comment-7795 chuck, neither actually, was on medium format. chuck, neither actually, was on medium format.

]]> By: chuck http://graememitchell.com/blog/fashion-editorial-soma-feb-09/comment-page-1#comment-7746 chuck Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:05:45 +0000 http://graememitchell.com/blog/?p=2947#comment-7746 this is really great graeme. it looks too crisp to be 35mm, is it on 4x5? this is really great graeme. it looks too crisp to be 35mm, is it on 4×5?

]]> By: bradford http://graememitchell.com/blog/fashion-editorial-soma-feb-09/comment-page-1#comment-7651 bradford Fri, 06 Feb 2009 01:38:10 +0000 http://graememitchell.com/blog/?p=2947#comment-7651 love the last shot. so i think i will actually like the mistake. love the last shot. so i think i will actually like the mistake.

]]> By: admin http://graememitchell.com/blog/fashion-editorial-soma-feb-09/comment-page-1#comment-7648 admin Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:59:36 +0000 http://graememitchell.com/blog/?p=2947#comment-7648 @Manny, nope, it's on film. @Manny, nope, it’s on film.

]]> By: Terence Patrick http://graememitchell.com/blog/fashion-editorial-soma-feb-09/comment-page-1#comment-7647 Terence Patrick Thu, 05 Feb 2009 19:50:00 +0000 http://graememitchell.com/blog/?p=2947#comment-7647 Very nice, Graeme. Love the light. Very nice, Graeme. Love the light.

]]> By: Manny http://graememitchell.com/blog/fashion-editorial-soma-feb-09/comment-page-1#comment-7645 Manny Thu, 05 Feb 2009 19:47:38 +0000 http://graememitchell.com/blog/?p=2947#comment-7645 They look great. Sucks about the prepress mix-up. Did you (Gasp) Shoot Digital? They look great. Sucks about the prepress mix-up.

Did you (Gasp) Shoot Digital?

]]> By: Garett Croft Stenson - Fashion Editorial, SOMA, Feb ‘09 http://graememitchell.com/blog/fashion-editorial-soma-feb-09/comment-page-1#comment-7637 Garett Croft Stenson - Fashion Editorial, SOMA, Feb ‘09 Thu, 05 Feb 2009 05:56:12 +0000 http://graememitchell.com/blog/?p=2947#comment-7637 [...] CLICK HERE TO SEE THE SHOOT [...]

[...] CLICK HERE TO SEE THE SHOOT [...]

]]> By: admin http://graememitchell.com/blog/fashion-editorial-soma-feb-09/comment-page-1#comment-7636 admin Thu, 05 Feb 2009 01:31:30 +0000 http://graememitchell.com/blog/?p=2947#comment-7636 Update: received word that there was an mistake at the mag in prepress and that this story went to press wrong. The last pic here was printed twice and the 2nd pic wasn't printed at all. Sigh. Did love that 2nd shot... Update: received word that there was an mistake at the mag in prepress and that this story went to press wrong. The last pic here was printed twice and the 2nd pic wasn’t printed at all. Sigh. Did love that 2nd shot…

]]>